I think some of those quoted here have got the supply and demand link the wrong way round – demand elicits or encourages supply; supply does not create demand of itself. Demand is already there – as demand reduction is only having a minimal effect. One has to remember as Mary Rice of EIA told me, that EIA is campaign led and its research is driven by its campaign aims. It wants the ivory trade ban and has produced a report that supports that objective. Others may differ with their aims and conclusions, it is for readers to decide KS
UK named as world’s largest legal ivory exporter
A new trade analysis reveals the scale of Britain’s role in the international ivory trade
Britain was the world’s largest exporter of legal ivory between 2010 and 2015, a breakdown of records held by the Convention on international trade in endangered species (Cites) has revealed.
Not only did the UK export more ivory than anyone else to Hong Kong and China – which are considered smuggling hubs for “blood ivory” – it also sold on 370% more ivory than the next highest exporter, the USA.
The new trade analysis, which is being released ahead of World Elephant Day on Saturday, will embarrass the government, after a call by Boris Johnson for “an all out ban” on ivory exports last month.
Mary Rice, the executive director of the Environmental Investigations Agency which carried out the research said: “UK ivory exports are stimulating consumer demand globally, especially in Hong Kong and China, two of the world’s largest markets for both legal and illegal ivory.
“The UK Government should stop issuing permits for all ivory exports with immediate effect, not least to show solidarity with the Hong Kong and Chinese governments which have both committed to closing their domestic ivory markets.”
International rules still allow Britain and other countries to legally export ivory when it is certified as having been “worked” or “carved” before 1976. And the UK government has dragged its heels over taking action, quietly dropping a 2015 manifesto pledge to “press for a total ban on ivory sales” in the summer election campaign earlier this year.
Antique ivory products manufactured before 1947 – such as billard balls, piano keys and chess pieces – are also legal and do not need a certificate, providing their age can be established.
Campaigners say that this creates a loophole, allowing ivory sawed from the 30,000 elephants killed for their tusks each year, to enter the market.
“As well as fuelling demand for ivory, the UK’s legal trade provides opportunities for the laundering of illegal ivory, both within the country and internationally,” Rice said.
The Liberal Democrat MEP Catherine Bearder who has campaigned on the issue, said: “This huge amount of trade going through the UK shames us all. It creates and sustains a market that needs to be shut down.
“The government should recognise that this is crisis time for elephants. On our watch, we could see the extinction of the majority of elephants in most of their range countries. We have to stand up and say that this is not acceptable.”
The UK is hosting an international conference on halting illegal wildlife trade next year, but its colonial history has bequeathed it a stockpile of ivory artefacts wrenched from more than a million elephants, on some estimates. Around 30,000 tonnes of ivory were shipped out of Africa – much of it using slave labour – during the days of empire.
A spokesperson for the Department for environment, food and rural affairs said: “Protecting elephants and ending the illegal ivory trade is a priority for us, which is why we have invested £26m since 2014 to tackle this insidious industry. However, this is not the end of our ambition as we will continue our role as a global leader in the fight against the illegal ivory trade.”
Hopes for a move towards a total ban were buoyed by a parliamentary statement from the foreign secretary last month. Questioned about official policy on the bloody trade, Boris Johnson said that the government was committed to an all-out ivory ban “and that is what we intend to pursue”.
However, some MEPs fear that a removal of EU regulatory oversight coupled with the prioritisation of trade issues after Brexit may obstruct conservation efforts.
“If the government has to go cap in hand to other countries for trade deals, I’m really concerned that we might start seeing a slip in standards,” Bearder said.
Between 2010 and 2012, the USA was the main destination for UK ivory imports but this changed dramatically between 2013 and 2015, as exports to Hong Kong and China surged ahead, the data breakdown shows.
Italy overtook Britain as the world’s largest single ivory seller in 2015, but the UK cumulatively consigned more ivory than the next four biggest exporting countries over the five-year period between 2010 and 2015.
Last month two tonnes of ivory were crushed in Central Park in New York. The US now has far stronger restrictions on the sale or resale of ivory than the UK.